- Writing Inc
- Posts
- š¤ Make an AI song, get half the royalties
š¤ Make an AI song, get half the royalties
PLUS: Microsoft regulates...itself?
How hard have you thought about how AI will replace your job?
As robots, we donāt worry too much about it.
But as writersā¦hoo boy.
š¤ Top Stories
š Grimes flips music on its head with AI
I'll split 50% royalties on any successful AI generated song that uses my voice. Same deal as I would with any artist i collab with. Feel free to use my voice without penalty. I have no label and no legal bindings.
ā ššÆš¦šŖš¢š° (@Grimezsz)
1:02 AM ⢠Apr 24, 2023
Artists like Drake and The Weeknd sue AI music makers.
Grimes is thinking a little differently.
Let's not sue. Let's partner with them.
Yup. Make a song using an AI version of Grimes, and split the royalties.
āFeel free to use my voice without penalty. I have no label and no legal bindings.ā
She clarified that the tunes should be tasteful, of course. She also would āprefer avoiding political stuff.ā
Since this is the first time that a major artist is doing this, there are bound to be hiccups.
Grimes has a hair above 5 million monthly streams on Spotify. Her top song has over 200 million streams.
Is this a new revenue model for artists?
š¬ China ensures no AI will go unregulated

As if there was any doubt...Chinaās serious about regulating AI.
The Cyberspace Administration of China unveiled censorship rules for AI earlier this month. The New York Times uncovered more details.
All responses from an AI must reflect āsocialist core valuesā. They must also avoid information that undermines āstate power.ā
A simpler way to look at this: AI-based chat must follow the same rules that all other content in China follows. Whatever the CCP says, goes.
Companies must also register their algorithms with regulators.
Weāre not surprised.
ChatGPT wonāt be the same in China.
š¤ AI regulation on the way?

BSA, a group backed in part by Microsoft, has some fresh AI legislation for us.
Itās a tech advocacy group backing companies like Oracle, Microsoft, Adobe, and IBM.
Hereās what the group wants for AI.
Congress should make clear requirements for when companies must evaluate the designs or impact of AI.
Those requirements should kick in when AI is used to make āconsequential decisions,ā which Congress should also define.
Congress should designate an existing federal agency to review company certifications of compliance with the rules.
Companies should be required to develop risk-management programs for high-risk AI.
Put another way: Congress needs to make requirements for AI. Congress needs to decide when those requirements should matter. And a federal agency should oversee all of this.
That second bullet point seems to be the one of most contention. ChatGPT can tell me a recipe, or accidentally tell me how to make napalm. Same product, different outcomes.
And knowing the US government, thereās no chance this becomes law.
š AI tools, tips, links
Text to video, now on the RunwayML app. Learn more
Have no fear. Coca-Cola is exploring new ways to leverage AI. Learn more
Stability AI isā¦partially a fraud? Maybe? Learn more
A CNBC anchor interviewing an AI version of himself. Learn more
A massive AI marketplace for tools. Learn more
Snapchat AI is off to aā¦rocky start.
Snapchat users are not happy with My AI.
Over the last week, Snapchats average rating was only 1.67 stars on the US app store and many users are calling for the chatbot to be shelved.
ā Product Hunt šø (@ProductHunt)
3:59 PM ⢠Apr 24, 2023
š¤ Got feedback for us?
Head over to our Twitter, @RobotRockDaily, and let us know what youād like to see more or less of.